New object
- Previous message (by thread): New object
- Next message (by thread): a few matters about security and consistency
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rimas Janusauskas
Rimas.Janusauskas at sc.vu.lt
Mon Jul 10 18:24:36 CEST 2000
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Rimas Janusauskas wrote: > > [skip] > RJ> 2. If accept your proposal, "organization" attribute with unique handle > RJ> like person/role MUST substitute inetnum(s), which became > RJ> [mandatory] [multiple] [look-up key] > RJ> attribute? I'm not sure that RIPE community is ready for such significant > RJ> changes... > > I'm very much surprized by 'multiple' status of proposed attribute. How > can netblock belong to more than one company (provided they are in > compliance with RIPE-185) ? Yes, there is also some possible problems with > either renaming (e.g., by splitting/merging) organization or other ways of > changing the "owner" of netblock. Mea cuppa! of course, it should be read 2. <...> "organization" object. Rimas
- Previous message (by thread): New object
- Next message (by thread): a few matters about security and consistency
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]