object definitions
- Next message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List 19991004
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel.titley at level3.com
Mon Oct 4 13:29:55 CEST 1999
We would be quite happy for the maintainer field to be mandatory in the domain, inetnum and person objects, and also, I would venture in the route, and as-macro object (since they are used by many to automatically build filter lists) Nigel On 07-Sep-99 Chris Ottrey wrote: > Hello, > > Work here at the NCC on the Re-Implementation Project (RIP), is well under > way. > > We have been looking closely at the existing definitions of objects > incorporating them into our new design. > > We thought that now might be a good time for getting ideas on any > changes in the object definitions that the wg would like to see. > > Eg. > - "mandatory" mnt_by field in domain > - "mandatory" mnt_by field in inetnum > - "mandatroy" mnt_by field in person > > (instead of the current - "optional".) > > (Eg. to provide some sort of indication of how much protection > users have against someone else deleting all their domains. Some > users may not even realize that it is possible.) > > Existing object definitions can be found at: > http://www.ripe.net/db/reimp/design/er/er_whois.html > > > Chris. > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > A ,-._|\ Chris Ottrey > \_ / Oz \ At work in Amsterdam, > \_,--._/ ottrey at ripe.net +31 20 535 4444 > -=-=-=-=-=-v-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= --- Tel: +44 171 864 4450 Fax: +44 171 864 4488 Well I'm disenchanted too. We're all disenchanted (James Thurber)
- Next message (by thread): Top 100 Maintainers List 19991004
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]