how to proceed with changed:

• Previous message (by thread): Beta Version of the State of the Database Reports.
• Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Karrenberg Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Mon Jun 8 14:44:16 CEST 1998

Let my try to summarise the discussion:

1) changed has a fuzzy definition, a more concise audit trail attribute 
   should replace it. A concrete proposal is needed. David has already 
   thought about this. Want to write it up. Do *not* call it changed:!

2) I porposed to exclude changed: from answers to normal queries.
   Present the changed attribute only when the query contains a special 
   flag (like -c).

   The only serious problem with the proposal I have read so far is the
   comparison for deleting an object. This could be changed to exclude 
   changed: attributes. 


Anything I am missing?

Daniel

• Previous message (by thread): Beta Version of the State of the Database Reports.
• Next message (by thread): how to proceed with changed:

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]