Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Janos Zsako
zsako at banknet.net
Mon Nov 3 12:20:42 CET 1997
> From owner-db-wg at ripe.net Mon Nov 3 11:27:09 1997 > > What about creating two databases? (Two categories of objects.) > > One for objects sent by non-registries, > > and one for well maintained, authentic objects. > > This may be an orthogonal categorization. Sorry, but many of the duplicates > (triplicates ...) already carry the "mnt-by" attribute, sometimes > even two instances the same one. There is another problem too: some objects do have a mnt-by, however the mntner has auth: NONE! :( Can we assume that these objects are well maintained? My answer is: no. Janos PS. I have seen this with both inetnum and route objects.
- Previous message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
- Next message (by thread): Who should do entries in RIPE database?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]