Who should do entries in RIPE database?

>   - Last but not least we could think about "closing" the DB for public,
>     that is anonymous, update or registration of objects. I think *that*
>     would require *very* careful consideration, discussion, and
>     establishing a broad consensus across (all of) the RIPE-WGs. 
>     I'd also expect considerable impact on activities like RIDE.

I got further (not too serious) ideas:

What about creating two databases? (Two categories of objects.)
One for objects sent by non-registries,
and one for well maintained, authentic objects.
Peoples could send objects to the level1 database, and registries
could move the correct ones to level2. Level1 objects older than
6 months will be automatically and silently deleted.
Level2 objects should be updated at least once a year, otherwise
a warning message goes to the maintainer registry.
After a certain period forgotten level2 objects go back to level1.

All current object is on level1.


Regards

Gabor