This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
update: minutes, DB-WG meeting, RIPE-23, Jan.96, Amsterdam
- Previous message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): new bug fix release of prtraceroute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Thu Mar 21 11:02:21 CET 1996
This is the updated minutes of the RIPE-23, Jan.96, DB-WG meeting.
Corrections submitted by David Kessens wrt
"network updates" and "security" have been included.
Best regards,
Wilfried.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Draft Minutes: Database-WG, RIPE 23, Amsterdam, NL
------------------------------------------------------
0. Administrative stuff
Kurt Kayser, ECRC, volunteered to take notes.
The WG meeting was split into two sessions
- part 1 to deal with currnt topic, problems and ideas
- part 2 the more traditional stuff
The proposed WG-agenda was accepted.
1. Databases and registries
B. Manning's review of the 192.0.0.0/8 address range prompted a brief
discussion of where the authoritative information should be maintained.
The general feeling was that networks used in Europe should be
documented in the RIPE-DB.
[
A comment was received after the WG-meeting to ask the Internic
(and other registries?) to expand the standard referral text ("The
InterNIC Registration Services Host contains...") to include pointers
to the RIPE-DB and maybe other registry sources.
]
From the user's point of view it would be very convenient to send
updates to a "local" database and have the software forward the
message(s) to the appropriate database(s) according to the source:
attribute.
Currently the RIPE-NCC holds copies of the following databases: RA,
MCI, APNIC, CA*Net - but NOT the InterNIC.
While things are to improve with the introduction of the shadow-dbs,
mirror copies are always sort of out-dated by definition.
RIPE intends to have a 10min delay.
Other problems identified:
- uniqueness of names / keys across different databases
- lookup and processing of entries from more than one DB
(e.g. evaluate AS-Macros from different DB...)
-> minority problem for the time being.
- quality control on information,
. like duplicate entries alert,
. automatic handle assignment,
. semantics for more than one person object for a given individual
. Registry ID information is maintained manually, this might change
by building links to objects in the public database.
2. User interface(s)
- access to the data in a more clever (selective) way by WAIS and/or
WWW.
A. Blasco Bonito and Paolo Bevilacqua have a test-version available
for a WWW interface that supports logical AND and OR of keys.
- whois "help"
gives on-line documentation
hypertext version being considered
- An on-line survey form is available via the RIPE-NCC web pages,
you are invited to use it to describe your wishes for access to data
kept at the RIPE-NCC.
- RADB/Merit has a web interface for queries and updates,
although this obviously works for auth: NONE or MAIL-FROM only
- proposal: put a pointer to whois "help" into ripe-104++
3. Authorization and Security
DFK reports that development work is on the action list (PGP facilities
to be integrated) but there is still a severe lack of resources.
Additional help is needed to make real progress, because design work is
necessary first. Th Key management would most probably be done according
to the Merit approach. We might benefit from (Euro-)CERT activities?
In more general terms, if we want to see development progress faster
than in the past, then we have to come up with clearly defined needs
and a proposal for a devlopment project with additional resources.
4. DB-SW report
David Kessens offered the traditional database software report.
The slides can be obtained from
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/presentations/ripe-m23-david-DB-REPORT.ps.gz
Another set of slides for the In-Addr-Check handling is available from
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/presentations/ripe-m23-david-DNS-INADDRCHECK.ps.gz
- beta version V1.1 that allows (close to) real-time mirroring is
available. At the time of writing these minutes (4-MAR-1996) the
distribution is at
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/dbase/software/ripe-dbase-1.1beta2.tar.gz
- requests to run a mirror copy are to be sent to ripe-dbm at ripe.net
- other changes include
. support for the BSD DB package
. a password controlled mechanism to overrule normal security
mechanisms (e.g. for adding maintainers and the like)
. "network updates" are now fully supported by the RIPE-DB SW.
Fully supported means:
"If your address is in the RIPE-DB access list"
However, this is a very powerful method and currently does not
provide enough data for the logs to track down problems.
For further study, before being made available to the community
at large.
. less memory consumption
In conjunction with the mirror capability, the software has to keep
track of individual object creations and updates. The mechanism that is
currently used is not suitable for long-term consistency (because the
sequntially increasing values are expected to suffer from wrap-around,
eventually).
Thus a stored: attribute was proposed and accepted.
stored: <NEW | UPD> <Date> <Time> <Serial>
Inclusion of the authorisation method used and the source of the update
was then asked for. DFK is going to circulate a detailed proposal.
In general the NCC proposes to use a keyword based mechanism on the
subject: line of DB update messages to request special processing.
This should eventually obsolete the multiple e-mail addresses, like
auto-assign at ripe.net, which are not widely known and their use is not
always properly enforced.
5. Hierarchical authorization
Implementation of hierarchical authorization is initially planned for
. domain name space
. IP-Address-Ranges for registries
. origin AS for routes
Moving the description of the hierarchy and the transactions allowed at
a particular level to a maintainer object was preferred over an
alternate method of using a scope: attribute.
6. Handles, Object review
Eventually the assignment of NIC-Handles (more precisely: RIPE handles)
is being implemented. David shall circulate a propsal about the logic
and the semantics to the mailing list.
Reverse lookup (for person objects, at least) is being worked on.
The country: attribute is being redefined to allow multiple lines with
multiple values, to better reflect the real scope of an entity (like
address blocks from a regional registry, AS numbers, etc.)
The Role: or NOC: object needs more thought and detailed definition.
There is still some uncertainty whether a full-blown new object (with a
handle) is really needed, or whether the person object can be extended.
Input was received from Michael H. Behringer that proposed a common
format for describing contact information, coverage and emergency
preocedures. This object is to be re-visited on the mailing list and a
decision about implementation is being sought on the list.
The proposal for an extension of the inet-rtr: object was briefly
discussed. The original intent was to allow for a description of Mbone
routers. However, extending the concept could be very useful for
describing all sorts of peerings, like Mbone, IP-over-IP, IPnG, and the
like. Due to the fact that there is already a couple of tools which
read the peer: attributes, it might be wise to not change the peer:
attribute as currently defined (but to eventually make it obsolete) and
to invent a new attribute with the peering protocol ID as the first
element, the address as the second element and then the specific
information. To be discussed in more detail on the mailing list.
url: it was agreed to add a new (optional) attribute to all objects to
allow for inclusion of URLs. The details to be worked out after some
more tests. Format could either be plain HTML or general URI syntax.
7. Input from other WGs
Already covered (see inet-rtr: for Mbone)
8. AOB
None. Meeting closed.
________________________________________________________________________________
List of new actions:
Daniel Karrenberg: To circulate a detailed proposal for the stored:
attribute.
David Kessens: To circulate a detailed proposal for the automatic handle
assignement.
Wilfried Woeber, Michael H. Behringer: To initiated discussion on the
mailing list about the need and possible format for a role: or
noc: object.
Wilfried Woeber: To initiated discussion on the mailing list about the
extension of the inet-rtr: object.
WW, 21.3.96
- Previous message (by thread): polling for ripe dbase software changes (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): new bug fix release of prtraceroute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]