Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Jan 19 17:34:17 CET 1996
> maybe there is another solution: migrate the "country" attribute to a > "registry" attribute which should hold the responsible registry name <ripe-104++ speak> I think *allocations* should be tagged with the unique NCC RegID, *assignments* should be tagged by [multiple] country codes. </ripe-104++ speak> I'm reluctant to let go of the well-established use of the country: attribute. I'm looking forward to the time when we might have more flexible selection criteria for the DB, and I think loosing country information isn't a good idea. Wilfried. PS: I'm thinking up some pro.s and con.s later :-) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Computer Center - ACOnet : Vienna University : Tel: +43 1 4065822 355 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4065822 170 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : NIC: WW144 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
- Next message (by thread): Proposal for extended syntax for the 'country:' attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]