Proposal on applying advisory attribute to "aut-num" object
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal on applying advisory attribute to "aut-num" object
- Next message (by thread): Proposal on applying advisory attribute to "aut-num" object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Mon Oct 23 15:58:51 CET 1995
>An other approach to this problem would not need any change in the DB schema. >We have the `remarks' attribute which can be used for any additional information >related to the AS. I think it could also contain something like: >"advisory: AS690 1:1800 2:1133 3:1239" which means, the aut-num would have >the following remarks attribute: >remarks: advisory: AS690 1:1800 2:1133 3:1239 >In this case any AS could add as many remarks as needed for the advisories... I think (mis-)using the remark: is a bad idea. It is already being used to e.g. describe DMZ configurations (ias-int:). It leaves too many things to bi-lateral agreements and there is just marginal syntax checking for the remark: attribute. A poor environment to base configuration decisions on.... But it might be appropriate to think about the advisory: as a remark, this might eventually discourage the use of it :-) Wilfried. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Computer Center - ACOnet : Vienna University : Tel: +43 1 4065822 355 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : Fax: +43 1 4065822 170 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : NIC: WW144 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal on applying advisory attribute to "aut-num" object
- Next message (by thread): Proposal on applying advisory attribute to "aut-num" object
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]