dom-net tag under domain
- Previous message (by thread): dom-net tag under domain
- Next message (by thread): dom-net tag under domain
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio_Blasco Bonito
bonito at nis.garr.it
Tue Nov 30 11:37:39 CET 1993
> > As Tony already said we'd rather not do that right now to avoid valatility > in database semantics. Please note that this will be fixed automatically > and in a very general manner once the database goes classless! > > Suggestion: The dom-net field is a "hint" field only. It does not hurt at all > to list the whole network even if only part of it is used by the particular > domain. One net can appear in several domain objects. > > Daniel In principle I agree, but to apply your suggestion we would have to change many entries which were written under the assumption that subnetworks were allowed in dom-net... We will rewrite dom-net: as remarks: dom-net: unless you can give us a piece of perl software (to put before the sintax checker) which converts from "subnet" to "whole net". Perl programmers are a very scarse resource here... ---------- ---------- Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246 Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I 56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052 ---------- ----------
- Previous message (by thread): dom-net tag under domain
- Next message (by thread): dom-net tag under domain
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]