Operational Contacts

> POC for the network. But if <customer> has problems, and <service_provider>
> wants to contact <customer>, the appropriate information can be stored
> in the general contact information as well. Pls keep in mind, that this
> contact information doesn't supersede the named [at]c's in the objects,
> but will provider general contact point if the specific poeple are not

What I read from this is that we have to distinguish between
the service provider's NOC and the customers own NOC.  So we
should have operational contact details for both the end site and
their service provider ?

So, assuming we still go with the NOC object idea, that means
a NOC object is created for the service provider, and one for
the end site's own NOC.  Each network the end site registers
then has a pointer to their NOC, and also to their service
provider's.

Does this make sense, or am I falling asleep already seeing as 
the weekend is here ? :)  I just don't think we gain anything
having information spread all over the database, that could be
maintained much more easily in one object.

Dunc