Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1993 00:22:23 +0100
> "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" woeber@localhost writes:
> I just submitted an object -containing a bdrygw-l: attribute- in order t
> change the connect: attribute. To avoid getting cute warnings I just
> _omitted_ the bdrygw-l: line altogether. Nevertheless, the warning was
> generated (see below).
> From my point of view, it would be more natural to not send diagnostics
> a guarded attribute does match exactly or is omitted altogether.
> Warning(s) should be generted only if there is a mismatch.
You are perfectly right. This is how it should work.
Goes on the to-be-fixed list.