[cooperation-wg] DNS4EU - proposal for a community response - draft

I think issuing the statement is a good idea.
Maybe you want to add a point that there is a risk of disruption of service
when changing something that has been working for more than 25 years?
Salam

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:16 PM Desiree Miloshevic <miloshevic at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear members, dear all
>
> Further to the RIPE NCC’s summary of the DNS4EU Open House discussion and
> further to your witnessing of our earlier 'transparent wordsmithing
> consultation' with other RIPE - WG Chairs,
> I’d like to propose the following high level statement draft for your
> consideration.
>
> Julf and myself, as Co-Chairs are in agreement with this draft statement
> and Achilleas had excused himself due to his affiliation with the EC.
>
> We’d like to know if there is some support from members for having a RIPE
> community response on this proposal?
>
> We would really appreciate your feedback or any comments you’d wish to
> make or if you'd like us to work further on this.
>
> Many thanks for your consideration and the feedback,
>
> Desiree
> --
> Coop WG Co-Chair
>
> Proposed DNS4EU RIPE community statement comments
>
>
>
>    1. RIPE community believes that governance of the DNS resolution
>    chain, which is such an important element of everybody's Internet
>    connectivity, should involve all stakeholders and can not solely rely on
>    legislation and regulatory oversight.
>
>
>    1.
>
>    RIPE Community hopes that any winning bidder will adhere to what we
>    see as a fundamental property of the Internet, with a diverse and
>    competitive landscape, anchored on the principles of multistakeholder
>    Internet governance.
>
>    2. RIPE Community believes that the responsibility of well-functioning
>    Internet access including the DNS resolution is with the access providers.
>    We believe it should stay that way.
>
>    3. We understand that to be able to minimise some risks when the end
>    user selects a random DNS resolver, a possible and feasible solution is to
>    have the access provider run their local DNS resolvers and/or an additional
>    DNS resolver as a back-up.
>
>    4.
>
>    We hope that the EU could allocate DNS4EU funds to the local Internet
>    community and encourage Internet access providers to run their local DNS
>    resolvers. Additionally, the funds can be also used towards the development
>    of open source software for better and affordable DNS resolution services.
>
>
>    On 2 Feb 2022, at 15:26, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>    Dear colleagues,
>
>    Thank you to all who joined for the RIPE NCC Open House discussion of
>    DNS4EU on Monday, 31 January. We have posted a summary of some key points
>    and links to the video archive here:
>
>    https://labs.ripe.net/author/chrisb/dns4eu-ripe-ncc-open-house-discussion/
>
>    Cheers
>    Chris
>    --
>
>    To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or
>    change your subscription options, please visit: https:
>    <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
> your subscription options, please visit:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20220205/d70413bc/attachment.html>