[cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE82 Coop WG agenda
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Fri May 7 22:15:20 CEST 2021
Marco Hogewoning wrote on 07/05/2021 15:30: > Personally I am not that worried about this particular amendment. > IMHO the way it is worded leaves it fairly open as to what > technologies to deploy, with RPKI being just flagged as an example. ok noted. > Important as well is that changing the recital like this, doesn't > alter the scope of the directive. In that sense it only stresses the > need for entities that fall within the scope to think about routing > security and take appropriate measures to prevent the risks in that > area. And I think we can all acknowledge that those risks do exist, > so would be hard to argue against. Yep, definitely no intention to argue against the principal. We all - community, legislators, etc - agree on the importance of routing security. The only concern I had was whether codifying specific ways of handling this was advisable, but if they're not being codified, that's fine. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Update on NIS 2: Proposed amendments by the Parliament alter scope on (root) DNS
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE82 Coop WG agenda
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]