[cooperation-wg] Follow up from the Coop WG call on NIS 2 Directive

Hi Desiree, Hi Julf,

Thanks for taking the initiative and for reporting back to the list.
I shared the link with the RIPE DNS WG.

Kind regards,
Mirjam Kühne



On 18/03/2021 15:20, Desiree Miloshevic wrote:
>
> Dear members of the Working Group
>
> The Cooperation Working Group held a remote session last week, the
> archives of which have been shared to the list. It was clear during
> that session that there were concerns from members of the RIPE
> community, and that the timeline for making any formal response was
> very limited (with a deadline of 18 March).
>
> Unfortunately, despite some very active discussion during the session,
> there was not much further discussion on the list. However, the
> Working Group Co-Chairs felt that, while there is not agreed “RIPE
> community position”, it is important that the concerns raised should
> be conveyed to EU policymakers.
>
> To that end, two of the Co-Chairs (not including Achilleas, who has
> recused himself from this activity as an employee of the European
> Commission) have developed a response to the current open consultation
> that highlights the key concerns expressed in the remote session. The
> submission asks that EU policymakers work closely with members of the
> RIPE community to refine the NIS2 draft and address the concerns raised.
>
> You can find the details of our Co-Chairs submission here:
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12475-Cybersecurity-review-of-EU-rules-on-the-security-of-network-and-information-systems/F2004655
> <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12475-Cybersecurity-review-of-EU-rules-on-the-security-of-network-and-information-systems/F2004655>
>
> Regards
>
> Desiree and Julf.
>
> RIPE Coop WG Co-Chairs
>