[cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion

Thank you so much for this Jim, and indeed, I clearly support both.

Regarding consensus, I should have realised that, so thanks for clarifying.

Best,
-Michael

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:18 PM Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 5 Jan 2021, at 13:37, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > When considering who to cast your vote for, my suggestion is to think of
> whose background and experience best compliments Julf and Achilleas'. I can
> think of no better way to assess.
>
> Indeed. But even then it is hard to choose. Both Des and Dick are
> excellent, well qualified candidates: equally good choices, albeit in
> different ways. I can’t pick between them. So I support both Dick and Des.
>
> FWIW we had a similar dilemma in the IoT WG last year: two strong and
> equally matched candidates for one vacancy.
>
> > Do any others feel similarly?
>
> Yes. Though *please* remember this is RIPE takes decisions by consensus.
> We don’t vote. And you can express support for more than one candidate.
>
> IMO it’s very likely someone will end up tossing a coin to make the
> selection.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20210105/36c58ede/attachment.html>