[cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [cooperation-wg-chairs] Cooperation WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jan 5 15:18:50 CET 2021
> On 5 Jan 2021, at 13:37, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote: > > When considering who to cast your vote for, my suggestion is to think of whose background and experience best compliments Julf and Achilleas'. I can think of no better way to assess. Indeed. But even then it is hard to choose. Both Des and Dick are excellent, well qualified candidates: equally good choices, albeit in different ways. I can’t pick between them. So I support both Dick and Des. FWIW we had a similar dilemma in the IoT WG last year: two strong and equally matched candidates for one vacancy. > Do any others feel similarly? Yes. Though *please* remember this is RIPE takes decisions by consensus. We don’t vote. And you can express support for more than one candidate. IMO it’s very likely someone will end up tossing a coin to make the selection.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [cooperation-wg-chairs] Cooperation WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]