From rhill at hill-a.ch Fri Jan 24 08:55:10 2020 From: rhill at hill-a.ch (Richard Hill) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:55:10 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN? Message-ID: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> Can anybody on this list respond to the question below? Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes, see: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/aso-to-jeffrey-et-al-27dec19-en.pdf Does anybody know if ICANN has responded and given NRO access to records? Thanks and best, Richard From michele at blacknight.com Fri Jan 24 15:35:36 2020 From: michele at blacknight.com (Michele Neylon - Blacknight) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 14:35:36 +0000 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN? In-Reply-To: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> References: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> Message-ID: There's nothing on the correspondence page but that doesn't mean that they didn't : https://www.icann.org/en/ec/correspondence Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 ?On 23/01/2020, 23:55, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Richard Hill" wrote: Can anybody on this list respond to the question below? Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes, see: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/aso-to-jeffrey-et-al-27dec19-en.pdf Does anybody know if ICANN has responded and given NRO access to records? Thanks and best, Richard From jim at rfc1035.com Fri Jan 24 18:16:36 2020 From: jim at rfc1035.com (Jim Reid) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:16:36 +0000 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN? In-Reply-To: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> References: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> Message-ID: > On 24 Jan 2020, at 07:55, Richard Hill wrote: > > Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes I?m doubly confused. Why is the ASO/NRO dabbling in domain name matters when its remit is numbering resources? It?s also not clear to me why the sale of PIR should be a matter for the ICANN board. But that?s a discussion that probably belongs elsewhere. From michele at blacknight.com Fri Jan 24 18:21:03 2020 From: michele at blacknight.com (Michele Neylon - Blacknight) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:21:03 +0000 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN? In-Reply-To: References: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> Message-ID: Jim There's some level of rationale in their letter: https://www.internetnews.me/2019/12/31/ip-numbers-types-flex-muscles-in-pir-debacle/ I'm not 100% sure why the Board was sucked into this, but they're definitely involved now. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 ?On 24/01/2020, 09:17, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Jim Reid" wrote: > On 24 Jan 2020, at 07:55, Richard Hill wrote: > > Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes I?m doubly confused. Why is the ASO/NRO dabbling in domain name matters when its remit is numbering resources? It?s also not clear to me why the sale of PIR should be a matter for the ICANN board. But that?s a discussion that probably belongs elsewhere. From staylor at ripe.net Mon Jan 27 17:28:24 2020 From: staylor at ripe.net (Suzanne Taylor) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:28:24 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC Roundtable Meeting Message-ID: Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC Roundtable Meeting for Governments and Regulators took place today in Brussels. The presentations, which covered topics ranging from industry developments in IPv6, 5G and security to emerging technologies like the IoT and AI, are available online: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/roundtable/january-2020 One of the topics that came up during the meeting are the contributions that the RIPE NCC makes as part of the multistakeholder community to various consultations held by governments, industry bodies and intergovernmental organisations. We?ve now published these contributions online as well, so you can see the messages that the RIPE NCC is promoting in the Internet governance space: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc-contributions-to-external-consultations As always, we?d be happy to hear your feedback or answer any questions you might have. Warm regards, Suzanne ________________ Suzanne Taylor External Relations RIPE NCC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chrisb at ripe.net Wed Jan 29 18:31:36 2020 From: chrisb at ripe.net (Chris Buckridge) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:31:36 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Any response to the NRO/ASO request to ICANN? In-Reply-To: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> References: <003f01d5d28b$9a2a7ae0$ce7f70a0$@ch> Message-ID: <364B23B5-351F-4292-A568-D85AB324E422@ripe.net> Dear Richard, all, At this stage there has not been an official response to the ASO?s request. This is also confirmed here: https://www.icann.org/en/ec/correspondence I?ll be happy to let the working group know when a response is received. Best regards, Chris Chris Buckridge Head of External Relations RIPE NCC > On 24 Jan 2020, at 08:55, Richard Hill wrote: > > Can anybody on this list respond to the question below? > > Over the holidays, the Address Supporting Organization wrote to ICANN, acting as a component of the "Empowered Community". They asked for an inspection of ICANN records relating to the .ORG sale, including board minutes, see: > > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/aso-to-jeffrey-et-al-27dec19-en.pdf > > Does anybody know if ICANN has responded and given NRO access to records? > > Thanks and best, > Richard > > >