[cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Buckridge
chrisb at ripe.net
Mon Apr 6 14:14:04 CEST 2020
Dear colleagues, Just to also note that the RIPE NCC (in our capacity as an ITU Standardization Sector Member) made a submission to TSAG (the Standardization Sector Advisory Group) discussions earlier this year. Our submission can be found here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc_tsag_new-ip.pdf (also linked from this page: https://www.ripe.net/participate/internet-governance/multi-stakeholder-engagement/ripe-ncc-contributions-to-external-consultations) Marco Hogewoning will shortly publish a further update on RIPE Labs (look for that in the next week or so), and given the current interest, I have a feeling it would be useful to devote some time in the RIPE 80 Cooperation WG session to discussion of this topic, at the Co-Chairs’ discretion. Best regards, Chris > On 6 Apr 2020, at 12:44, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > Daniel Karrenberg wrote on 06/04/2020 11:18: >> The IETF liaison statement is quite clear and complete, much clearer than the proposals. Rather than adding to the noise RIPE should consider supporting that statement. > > Would the NRO be interested in issuing a statement of support for the IETF position? > > Nick > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet 2030
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]