[cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sun Oct 23 14:15:47 CEST 2016
Hi Marco - On 21.10.2016 10:55, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > As the response mentioned, we have attended the previous Study Group > meetings and of course during those we also had informal exchanges > with the rapporteurs, chairman and vice chairs of the group. that appears to have slipped through unread for some reason. My apologies. > The Liaison Statement did not come as a surprise as those were > discussed at the last SG20 meeting. In that sense, the formal > exchange of a Liaison Statement is a matter of ITU procedures, which > they have to follow. > > As all RIRs received similar Liaisons, some coordination took place > amongst the RIR staff and LACNIC and APNIC have also shared their > responses with us. > > Of course as a member participating in the Study Group, we can also > contribute directly and make interventions during the meetings, > should we feel that is necessary. Thanks for the clarification and the detailing. Have a good RIPE 73 week, all - best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] RIPE NCC's response to ITU SG20 Liaison Statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]