[cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Thu May 26 15:09:04 CEST 2016
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Meredith Whittaker <meredithrachel at google.com> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > Thank you for your constructive comment. > > To be clear, we made the announcement for candidates before this meeting. > And, candidates have come forward (and still can). I think we can discuss > what we'd like these people to do or not do, but I don't think it's > productive to walk back the process to review a conversation we could be > having in parallel. fair point, it's already started the process ongoing, it's strange but done is done:-) ... now I guess the important point is to get atleast one more chair to support you, I will suggest two more chairs so you are thee in total. These two should have different background and view on things. Get some diversity and experience to the table. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Status on co-chairs process?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]