[cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johan Helsingius
julf at julf.com
Wed May 25 15:25:04 CEST 2016
On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote: > Although of course it is good if we also have consensus. Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those modifiers in the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate a common view in case there is one. Julf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160525/d6ee48e6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]