[cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chairs - current status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at ISOC.DE
Tue Jul 12 09:43:38 CEST 2016
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Johan Helsingius wrote: > I appreciate the expressions of support from both you and Nick, > but at the same time I agree that it is up to the current chair(s) > to decide, and I do feel that it is important the co-chairs are > people the current chair(s) feel happy to work with. I feel that we have a significant confusion regarding the chairs' role and position. <https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/coop/cooperation-wg-chair-selection-process> is quite clear in stating that the two or three chairs are collectively chairing the goup, but the WG gets to decide (which is not unlike the other RIPE WGs). I have not received signals that the WG was accidentally off track with combining its choices. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] time-lines for co-chair appointments
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Co-chairs - current status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]