From nurani at netnod.se Thu Oct 8 14:38:24 2015 From: nurani at netnod.se (Nurani Nimpuno) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:38:24 +0200 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [CRISP-TEAM] CRISP Team Call Agenda e: [NRO-IANAXFER] Reminder CRISP Team Call today October 8th 2015 13:00 UTC References: <5616393B.70308@nic.ad.jp> Message-ID: <159E9B39-8682-43E1-B312-BC4E0706934F@netnod.se> Apologies for the late sharing of this. Nurani on behalf of the RIPE CRISP team > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Izumi Okutani > Subject: [CRISP-TEAM] CRISP Team Call Agenda e: [NRO-IANAXFER] Reminder CRISP Team Call today October 8th 2015 13:00 UTC > Date: 8 oktober 2015 11:36:59 CEST > To: German Valdez , ianaxfer at nro.net, crisp at nro.net > > Dear Colleagues, > > > Please see below the agenda for the meeting today. > > You can find the Webex details from German's mail and anyone is welcome to join as an observer as usual. > > --- > 1. Agenda Review > > 2. Action Items > a. Minutes from the last call > > 3. The questions from the ICG > > 4. IPR > a. Principles > b. IANAPLAN approach > c. Implementation time > > 5. General implementation plan > > 6. ICANN54 > > 7. Next Meetings > > 8. AOB > --- > > Izumi & Nurani > > On 2015/10/08 10:34, German Valdez wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> This is reminder of the scheduled CRISP Team call to be hold later today. >> >> Observers are welcome to join >> >> Below is webex details. >> >> Regards >> >> German Valdez >> NRO Secretariat >> >> >> >> JOIN WEBEX MEETING >> https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/j.php?MTID=m31c9ec30fcbe5ab39d62d984dfbf2358 >> Meeting number: 709 316 083 >> Meeting password: crisp >> >> >> JOIN BY PHONE >> 0800-051-3810 Call-in toll-free number (UK) >> +44-203-478-5289 Call-in toll number (UK) >> Access code: 709 316 083 >> >> Global call-in numbers: >> https://ripencc.webex.com/ripencc/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=389533727&tollFree=1 >> >> Toll-free dialing restrictions: >> http://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ianaxfer mailing list >> ianaxfer at nro.net >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer >> > > > _______________________________________________ > CRISP mailing list > CRISP at nro.net > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp From nick at inex.ie Wed Oct 14 16:26:26 2015 From: nick at inex.ie (Nick Hilliard) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:26:26 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] NRO Statement on IANA Stewardship Transition and ICANN Accountability In-Reply-To: <9CA6B678-7023-4295-B551-889BACB98512@arin.net> References: <9CA6B678-7023-4295-B551-889BACB98512@arin.net> Message-ID: <561E6612.1050307@inex.ie> FYI. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] NRO Statement on IANA Stewardship Transition and ICANN Accountability Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:28:04 +0000 From: John Curran To: ianaxfer at nro.net https://www.nro.net/news/nro-statement-on-iana-stewardship-transition-and-icann-accountability FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ ianaxfer mailing list ianaxfer at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer From ripencc-management at ripe.net Wed Oct 14 17:40:13 2015 From: ripencc-management at ripe.net (Nick Hyrka) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:40:13 +0200 Subject: [cooperation-wg] NRO Statement on IANA Stewardship Transition and ICANN Accountability Message-ID: <7374079D-20B9-4612-866F-4A61DD51413C@ripe.net> This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organization (NRO) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NRO STATEMENT ON IANA STEWARDSHIP TRANSITION AND ICANN ACCOUNTABILITY The NRO takes this opportunity to comment on the current discussions of ICANN accountability, prior to the series of meetings coming up in Dublin, Ireland, during October 2015. The NRO has worked to ensure that to the extent possible, relationships between ICANN, RIRs and the global numbering communities are established in formal relationships that provide necessary definition and separation of responsibilities. The number community proposal for IANA oversight transition relies on these existing relationships, and builds on them to ensure that responsibilities, commitments and accountabilities are clear and robust in the post-transition environment. Regarding our expectations of ICANN accountability: in our relationships with ICANN, we have and will continue to rely upon binding agreements as the primarily mechanism for ICANN accountability to the numbers community. Regarding organisational models for ICANN accountability, the NRO notes that two legal memos [1][2] reached the conclusion that ICANN currently uses a ?Designator? model for appointment of Directors, and that the designators currently have the power to remove the Directors that they appoint. We also note that both legal memos pointed out gaps in the current ICANN bylaws, and one of them was associated with concrete suggestions for bylaw changes to address the identified gaps [3]. The NRO believes that a clarification and formalisation of ICANN?s existing designator structure via the ?Empowered SO/AC Designator? model (as referenced in the CCWG-Accountability ?2nd Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations? [4]) is the most straightforward approach to provide ICANN structural accountability to the community. We believe that the ability for designator organisations (SOs, ACs, and the NomCom) to remove and replace their designated Directors would provide a sufficient mechanism for enforcement of the desired community powers. However, we are able to support any accountability reform proposal which preserves and ensures ICANN?s ability to perform in accordance with our agreements, providing also that they are consistent with the successful IANA stewardship transition in the time available. The NRO is fully committed to the completion of the current IANA stewardship transition as a desirable and necessary evolution of the current ICANN and IANA models. Indeed, this is an overdue development that we have explicitly supported in several prior public statements. We therefore urge the global multistakeholder community to continue the work to converge on a mutually acceptable accountability reform proposal, which needs to achieve only the following: ? Satisfying immediate concerns over ICANN accountability ? Allowing the IANA transition to take place within the expected timeframe ? Ensuring that ICANN evolution can and will continue in future. Finally we recognise the ongoing efforts by the CCWG and the ICANN Board to arrive to a successful conclusion of the work which is necessary for the IANA transition to occur. It is important that all of these efforts be fully respectful of the work of the community and that any discrepancies be dealt with in a true and amicable multistakeholder fashion. Alan Barrett CEO AFRINIC John Curran President and CEO ARIN Paul Wilson Director General APNIC Oscar Robles CEO LACNIC Axel Pawlik Managing Director RIPE NCC References: [1] ?Proposed Articles and Bylaw Amendments for ICANN?, Caplin & Drysdale, 31 Mar 2015. A memo discussing the existing designator model within ICANN, and discussing proposed amendments to the ICANN bylaws. Associated with proposed bylaw amendments [3]. Forwarded to the CCWG on 7 April 2015: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150407/de2d2f36/ARINMemoonProposedICANNBylawsAmendments-0001.pdf [2] ?Current Corporate Status of ICANN under California Law?, Sidley Austin and Adler & Colvin, 11 Oct 2015. A memo concluding that ICANN currently functions under a designator model under California law, and identifying related gaps in the current ICANN bylaws. Forwarded to the CCWG on 12 Oct 2015: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151012/66a93bb8/Memo-CurrentCorporateStatusofICANNunderCalifornialaw-0001.pdf [3] ?Proposed Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers re Designators?, Caplin & Drysdale, 31 Mar 2015. Associated with memo [1]. Forwarded to the CCWG on 7 April 2015: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150407/de2d2f36/ARINProposedAmendmentsforICANNreDesignators-0001.pdf [4] ?CCWG-Accountability 2nd Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations?, 3 August 2015: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-draft-2-proposal-work-stream-1-recs-03aug15-en.pdf From nurani at netnod.se Thu Oct 29 14:56:22 2015 From: nurani at netnod.se (Nurani Nimpuno) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:56:22 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion of CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability References: <5632212A.406@nic.ad.jp> Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, Please see the ICG announcement below. A major milestone in the IANA Stewardship transition process! Kind regards, Nurani Nimpuno > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Izumi Okutani > Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion of CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability > Date: 29 oktober 2015 14:37:46 CET > To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" > > Dear Colleagues, > > > This announcement is now published - Congratulations and many thanks to the ICG for combining the proposal and leading the process! > > ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion of CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability > https://www.ianacg.org/icg-completes-its-work-and-awaits-conclusion-of-ccwg-on-enhancing-icann-accountability/ > > --- > Thursday, 29 October 2015 12:41 > IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal: > https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-transition-proposal-v9.pdf > > The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group has finalized the IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal with the exception of one outstanding item. The names portion of the proposal is conditioned on ICANN-level accountability mechanisms currently under development in the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG). Before sending this proposal to the NTIA via the ICANN Board, the ICG will secure confirmation from the CWG that its accountability requirements have been met. > > The ICG would like to thank all those who submitted public comments during the ICG?s public comment period. The ICG discussed this input and incorporated it into the current proposal as appropriate. As a result, matters relating to the dependency between the CWG and the CCWG, the Post-Transition IANA, the Root Zone Maintainer, the jurisdiction of ICANN, intellectual property related to IANA, and conformance with the NTIA criteria, among other matters, have been clarified. > > The numbers and protocol parameters portions of the proposal are complete, ready for implementation, and have no dependencies on the work of the CCWG or other remaining processes. Preparation for implementation of the numbers and protocol parameters proposals is underway and can continue without waiting for the CCWG to complete its work. > --- > > > Izumi > > > _______________________________________________ > ianaxfer mailing list > ianaxfer at nro.net > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer From athina.fragkouli at ripe.net Thu Oct 29 15:46:42 2015 From: athina.fragkouli at ripe.net (Athina Fragkouli) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:46:42 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] ICANN 54: Addressing the Accountability Question Message-ID: <56323152.4080606@ripe.net> Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC has published a report on the recent ICANN 54 meeting, focusing on events relating to ICANN accountability and the IANA stewardship transition. You can find this report here: https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/industry-developments/icann-54-addressing-the-accountability-question Kind regards, Athina Fragkouli Legal Counsel RIPE NCC From paf at frobbit.se Thu Oct 29 19:18:18 2015 From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:18:18 +0100 Subject: [cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion of CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability In-Reply-To: References: <5632212A.406@nic.ad.jp> Message-ID: <714AA1BC-5B58-41DB-BC6A-33680F8570BA@frobbit.se> Dear Colleagues, but specifically Nurani, Andrei and Paul, As co-chair of the ICG let me thank you all for the support and the extremely hard work I know you have done. THANKS! Patrik F?ltstr?m Co-Chair, ICG On 29 Oct 2015, at 14:56, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Please see the ICG announcement below. > A major milestone in the IANA Stewardship transition process! > > Kind regards, > Nurani Nimpuno > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Izumi Okutani >> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion >> of CCWG on Enhancing ICANN Accountability >> Date: 29 oktober 2015 14:37:46 CET >> To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> >> This announcement is now published - Congratulations and many thanks >> to the ICG for combining the proposal and leading the process! >> >> ICG Completes its Work and Awaits Conclusion of CCWG on Enhancing >> ICANN Accountability >> https://www.ianacg.org/icg-completes-its-work-and-awaits-conclusion-of-ccwg-on-enhancing-icann-accountability/ >> >> --- >> Thursday, 29 October 2015 12:41 >> IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal: >> https://www.ianacg.org/icg-files/documents/IANA-transition-proposal-v9.pdf >> >> The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group has finalized the >> IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal with the exception of one >> outstanding item. The names portion of the proposal is conditioned on >> ICANN-level accountability mechanisms currently under development in >> the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability >> (CCWG). Before sending this proposal to the NTIA via the ICANN Board, >> the ICG will secure confirmation from the CWG that its accountability >> requirements have been met. >> >> The ICG would like to thank all those who submitted public comments >> during the ICG?s public comment period. The ICG discussed this >> input and incorporated it into the current proposal as appropriate. >> As a result, matters relating to the dependency between the CWG and >> the CCWG, the Post-Transition IANA, the Root Zone Maintainer, the >> jurisdiction of ICANN, intellectual property related to IANA, and >> conformance with the NTIA criteria, among other matters, have been >> clarified. >> >> The numbers and protocol parameters portions of the proposal are >> complete, ready for implementation, and have no dependencies on the >> work of the CCWG or other remaining processes. Preparation for >> implementation of the numbers and protocol parameters proposals is >> underway and can continue without waiting for the CCWG to complete >> its work. >> --- >> >> >> Izumi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ianaxfer mailing list >> ianaxfer at nro.net >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer