[cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Feb 5 15:50:10 CET 2015
On 5 Feb 2015, at 14:26, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > In short, I don't see a problem with the CRISP proposal (+ repeat my > previous support for it) and am satisfied that Richard Hill's concerns are > either misplaced or else have been adequately addressed. Me too! I wholeheartedly support the CRISP proposal and the open process it used to engage with everyone and reach consensus.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]