[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Wed Sep 24 10:25:20 CEST 2014
In message <542185A7.8050803 at quark.net>, at 07:37:27 on Tue, 23 Sep 2014, Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> writes >>> If we don't really want the organizational record in the IANA registry >>> any more for the /8s, >> >> Which might be a good idea. >> >>> then we should instruct IANA to update the records in a way the >>> community desires. >> >> Who are "we", and which community? >> >You and me, and the other interested parties in the internet community. >We set internet number policy for the resources. I see. So not whoever gets to be the new oversight body. Of course if "we" are the people running the oversight body (or perhaps it's supposed to be more *multi*stakeholder than that) then we could exert an influence via that route. >> How do you make IANA comply? And if they don't, what sort of oversight >> mechanism needs to be in place to escalate it to. > >We can ask IANA on the status of managing these records and if there is >anything they are currently working on to make these records more up to >date. > >If the current policy does not allow them to update the records as we >would like, The current policy might allow them, but for some reason they decline to update. >we could put together a global policy which would instruct IANA how to >manage the records. You are suggesting a replacement policy would place a duty on them, rather than simply allowing them to? -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]