[cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] benefits of walled gardens [DNS-based filtering]
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Sun Jan 26 18:17:53 CET 2014
On 26 jan 2014, at 17:27, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote: >> And I thought this paper was about domains more than domain registries? > > Yes, which is why the paper should positively avoid the inclusion of confusing examples such as domains operated by I* entities. My view is that a paper should include example domain names that are defined to be example domain names. See RFC2606 / RFC6761 (i.e. BCP32). I.e. I think the author of this document has done the right thing. Patrik -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20140126/61c78d77/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] benefits of walled gardens [DNS-based filtering]
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]