[cooperation-wg] appointing a new co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Candidates
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] appointing a new co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Sat Oct 26 11:49:53 CEST 2013
On 26 Oct 2013, at 10:25, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: > Just waiting for Warsaw does not seem that sensible though. +1. Let's get this done quickly and with the minimum of fuss. > So what should be the plan? IMO the current chair(s) should pick who they think is the best candidate, explain why and ask the WG to endorse that decision. [For this exercise we could assume Patrik hasn't resigned until his replacement is in place.] Keep the appointment process simple and lightweight. FWIW my preference would be to have someone who has a regulatory/government background rather than a mostly Internet person. The former should have a wider set of contacts with the people and organisations we'd like to bring in to the WG as well as a better understanding of what goes on in government/regulatory circles. Perhaps others here could say which characteristics they want (or don't want) from the new co-chair? That would help Maria (and Patrik?) choose the candidiate most likely to get widest endorsement form the WG. I'm sure whoever gets chosen would of course get that endorsement.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Candidates
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] appointing a new co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]