[cooperation-wg] Internet governance

In message <D7FA8C88-57DB-4701-9A3D-22DDCB2CC161 at netnod.se>, at 20:34:43 
on Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> writes
>> Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some
>>considerable time).
>
>Leo and Nick addressed this, and I agree with their assessment of the events at the time.

Which differs from the perception of those running IXPs.

[Square bracket issues]

>Maybe I've been unlucky in the meetings I've attended, but I've seen this happen several times, resulting in the discussions collapsing, not
>leaving me with much faith in that process.

Perhaps that's because you have observer-bias towards discussions in 
subgroups rather than the plenary.

I've been to enough meetings where the plenary *must* craft a 
deliverable (which is I think where we started vis-vis the IGF) to know 
that by the end of the meeting all the square brackets *must* have been 
removed. Even if an arguably dysfunctional sub-group less familiar with 
the process couldn't manage it earlier in the process.
-- 
Roland Perry