[cooperation-wg] [ncc-announce] [news] RIRs Publish Response to ITU WTPF Opinions on Internet Governance

Hello All,

Thanks very much for your comments. I can see your point and I ahve had 
some discussions with Bijal (Euro-IX) who said she would work on some 
text that we can use to address your concerns.

This text I think should be coordinated together with ISOC if they plan 
to provide a more detailed submission to Opinion 1.

I await your text suggestion, but please be aware that time is now not 
on our side and I will need to have all five RIRs agree this text.

If I cannot get text that suits in time we might have to consider 
removing any submission from the RIRs to Opinion 1. This may be better 
than a contribution that is not suitable for our community.

Cheers,
Paul




On 4/24/13 1:10 PM, Bastiaan Goslings wrote:
> I agree as well - I stated simular worries earlier towards the Dutch delegation re draft opinion #1
>
> -Bastiaan
>
> Skickat från min iPad
>
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:03, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Lindqvist Kurt Erik
>> Sent: 24 April 2013 09:15
>> To: Paul Rendek
>> Cc: cooperation-wg at ripe.net; Sally Wentworth
>> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] [ncc-announce] [news] RIRs Publish Response to ITU WTPF Opinions on Internet Governance
>>
>>
>> On 23 apr 2013, at 16:40, Paul Rendek <rendek at ripe.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks very much for your suggestion. While we will submit the text, we plan to speak further to it during the WTPF and will highlight the role of regional peering groups.
>>>
>>> There is a reason that we did not provide a more detailed response to Opinion 1. An initial response on this opinion was given by ISOC and I believe they intend to submit a more thorough response to this particular opinion. I suggest you speak further with ISOC regarding their planned text submission on Opinion 1.
>>>
>>> Please contact Sally Wentworth @ ISOC about this. She can be reached at <wentworth at isoc.org> and I have CC'd her in this message.
>>>
>>> I look forward to seeing you in Dublin.
>> I think the NRO text is troubling. It talks about multistakerholderism but it fails to invite, or as I would prefer recommend (not to say demand) that the ITU work and support inside existing frameworks rather than create competing efforts. I think it's important that this is clearly spelled out and not just talked over or mentioned. If the NRO isn't changing this statement (that I think is far from clear) then I really hope that ISOC includes this and stresses the importance of the ITU not working against or outside established and well working efforts.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - kurtis -
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>