[connect-wg] FW: [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)

Dear Connect WG,  

As co-chair of the Address Policy WG, I would like to inform you at the following AP-WG proposal by Remco van Mook to adjust the default allocation size for IXP space.  

The discussion will be on a AP-WG mailing list and I would suggest to the Connect WG to provide your experience and input on this idea. 

This will have an impact on your business/operation .. we need to receive your view and insight.  

Regards
Erik Bais 
On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective

On 15/10/2019, 14:43, "address-policy-wg on behalf of Marco Schmidt" <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:

    Dear colleagues,
    
    A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-07, "Default assignment size for IXPs"
    is now available for discussion.
    
    This proposal aims to change the default IXP assignment size from a /24
    to a needs-based model, with a /27 as a minimum.
    
    You can find the full proposal at:
    
    https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-07
    
    As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
    four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
    feedback to the proposer.
    
    At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
    the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
    
    We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
    <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 13 November 2019.
    
    Regards,
    
    Marco Schmidt
    Policy Officer
    RIPE NCC