From meier-hahn at hiig.de Mon Oct 2 15:06:36 2017 From: meier-hahn at hiig.de (Uta Meier-Hahn) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:06:36 +0200 Subject: [connect-wg] Informal coordination among networkers Message-ID: <02C2D40B-BB09-47D2-9863-5C7DF28E52F5@hiig.de> Hello, just recently I have published an article over at RIPE Labs, which may be interesting for some of you: *When Internet Interconnection Trouble Occurs, Immediate Coordination Kicks in* https://labs.ripe.net/Members/uta_meier_hahn/when-internet-interconnection-trouble-occurs-immediate-coordination-kicks-in I will be happy to hear your thoughts about it, e.g. in the comments. Best wishes Uta PS: Sharing is caring :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mir at ripe.net Tue Oct 17 10:59:21 2017 From: mir at ripe.net (Mirjam Kuehne) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:59:21 +0200 Subject: [connect-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Interconnection Agreements at Scale: Secret or Simple? Message-ID: <1818ebb0-2003-e07b-9ed0-eb8377bac4a2@ripe.net> Dear colleagues, Please find this new article by Martin Hannigan and Job Snijders on RIPE Labs: Interconnection Agreements at Scale: Secret or Simple? Are settlement free interconnection agreements at scale, or otherwise, really a secret? They can be. This article provides a peep hole into the world of codified private interconnections. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/martin_hannigan/interconnection-agreements Kind regards, Mirjam Kuhne RIPE NCC From zbynek at dialtelecom.cz Tue Oct 24 11:50:26 2017 From: zbynek at dialtelecom.cz (=?UTF-8?B?WmJ5bsSbayBQb3Nww61jaGFs?=) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:50:26 +0200 Subject: [connect-wg] Connect WG agenda In-Reply-To: References: <00C23CE1-756F-4884-BFE8-EFDF3A03C802@ripe.net> Message-ID: <41702792-beb5-2d3f-8b87-8cfa2b4d22d1@dialtelecom.cz> Hello, It is clear that recyclation helps to protect the environment, but I'm not sure if it really true when we talk about presentations. Some of the presetnations I remember from EPF, some of them from other meetings, and, frankly, I have to say there has been no presentation at this session I don't remember from any other meeting (so I appreciate I decided to miss Dubai). Do you really see such way of this WG productive? -- S pozdravem/Best Regards, Zbyn?k From remco.vanmook at gmail.com Thu Oct 26 09:46:20 2017 From: remco.vanmook at gmail.com (remco van mook) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:46:20 +0400 Subject: [connect-wg] Call for nominations Message-ID: Dear friends of connect-wg, as promised during the session earlier this week, we?ve now reached the point where we need to look at who runs this working group again. If you?re interested, please express your interest on this list before November 8, either on this list or to the chairs at connect-wg-chairs at ripe.net Here is the timeline: ? October 25 - Call for nominations ? November 8 - Announcing the list of candidates ? November 8-21 - Discussion phase ? November 22 - Decision by current WG chairs As already mentioned during the session, both Florence and me are happy to continue in our roles as co-chairs, if the working group agrees. Kind regards. Remco (and Florence) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: