From remco.vanmook at gmail.com Wed Oct 14 10:47:08 2015 From: remco.vanmook at gmail.com (remco van mook) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:47:08 +0000 Subject: [connect-wg] Connect-WG at RIPE 71 Message-ID: Dear friends of Connect-WG, in about a month's time we'll be meeting again in lovely Bucharest, Romania. We already have some presentations and updates for the agenda but we'd like to see some more. Topics like: - (de)peering automation - Who's sending me this traffic on an IXP? - I went to the desert and all I had was this lousy 4G signal would be most welcome. Please let us know as soon as possible so we can finish the agenda. Or you'll have to listen to Remco's $1000 IXP presentation again :) Kind regards, Remco and Florence Connect-WG co-chairs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew at walster.org Wed Oct 14 15:01:01 2015 From: matthew at walster.org (Matthew Walster) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:01:01 +0100 Subject: [connect-wg] Connect-WG at RIPE 71 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Would there be benefit in pimping http://peering.readthedocs.org/ again? I'd like to try and get it to a state where there's a simple and easy to follow guide to getting prefix lists across all peering fabrics. Not enough people do this today. M On 14 October 2015 at 09:47, remco van mook wrote: > > Dear friends of Connect-WG, > > in about a month's time we'll be meeting again in lovely Bucharest, > Romania. We already have some presentations and updates for the agenda but > we'd like to see some more. > > Topics like: > - (de)peering automation > - Who's sending me this traffic on an IXP? > - I went to the desert and all I had was this lousy 4G signal > > would be most welcome. Please let us know as soon as possible so we can > finish the agenda. > > Or you'll have to listen to Remco's $1000 IXP presentation again :) > > Kind regards, > > Remco and Florence > Connect-WG co-chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > connect-wg mailing list > connect-wg at ripe.net > https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jejs+lists at sahala.org Wed Oct 14 20:52:44 2015 From: jejs+lists at sahala.org (joshua sahala) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:52:44 -0600 Subject: [connect-wg] Connect-WG at RIPE 71 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Matthew, thanks for sharing. have you considered taking this through the BCOP track? cheers /joshua On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Matthew Walster wrote: > Would there be benefit in pimping http://peering.readthedocs.org/ again? > > I'd like to try and get it to a state where there's a simple and easy to > follow guide to getting prefix lists across all peering fabrics. Not enough > people do this today. > > M > > On 14 October 2015 at 09:47, remco van mook wrote: >> >> >> Dear friends of Connect-WG, >> >> in about a month's time we'll be meeting again in lovely Bucharest, >> Romania. We already have some presentations and updates for the agenda but >> we'd like to see some more. >> >> Topics like: >> - (de)peering automation >> - Who's sending me this traffic on an IXP? >> - I went to the desert and all I had was this lousy 4G signal >> >> would be most welcome. Please let us know as soon as possible so we can >> finish the agenda. >> >> Or you'll have to listen to Remco's $1000 IXP presentation again :) >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Remco and Florence >> Connect-WG co-chairs >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> connect-wg mailing list >> connect-wg at ripe.net >> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg >> > > > _______________________________________________ > connect-wg mailing list > connect-wg at ripe.net > https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg > From matthew at walster.org Thu Oct 15 11:54:31 2015 From: matthew at walster.org (Matthew Walster) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:54:31 +0100 Subject: [connect-wg] Connect-WG at RIPE 71 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've considered it, and once I have a little more structure I'm planning on introducing the idea to various BCOP groups (including RIPE) but first and foremost I don't want this effort to be a BCOP that is filed away in long technical prose. I see this project more of a document to be handed out by IXPs to new members on how to use prefix filtering. It should be a document with pretty pictures and plenty of worked examples for various platforms, and ideally with a couple of additional deliverables: * A slide deck for people to pick up and present at conferences. * If possible, a 5 minute video on how to do it and why -- not a screencast but a flashy video that catches attention. I absolutely don't want another dry, boring document like http://nabcop.org/index.php/EBGP_Configuration_BCOP_v0.1 -- it should not be comprehensive, it should concentrate on the key points only and make the work required as low effort/risk as possible. In my experience, BCOPs tend to be overly bogged down in minutiae and only provide examples in IOS style configuration syntax. I'd appreciate feedback. Matthew On 14 October 2015 at 19:52, joshua sahala wrote: > Matthew, > > thanks for sharing. have you considered taking this through the BCOP track? > > cheers > /joshua > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Matthew Walster > wrote: > > Would there be benefit in pimping http://peering.readthedocs.org/ again? > > > > I'd like to try and get it to a state where there's a simple and easy to > > follow guide to getting prefix lists across all peering fabrics. Not > enough > > people do this today. > > > > M > > > > On 14 October 2015 at 09:47, remco van mook > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Dear friends of Connect-WG, > >> > >> in about a month's time we'll be meeting again in lovely Bucharest, > >> Romania. We already have some presentations and updates for the agenda > but > >> we'd like to see some more. > >> > >> Topics like: > >> - (de)peering automation > >> - Who's sending me this traffic on an IXP? > >> - I went to the desert and all I had was this lousy 4G signal > >> > >> would be most welcome. Please let us know as soon as possible so we can > >> finish the agenda. > >> > >> Or you'll have to listen to Remco's $1000 IXP presentation again :) > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Remco and Florence > >> Connect-WG co-chairs > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> connect-wg mailing list > >> connect-wg at ripe.net > >> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > connect-wg mailing list > > connect-wg at ripe.net > > https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From job at instituut.net Wed Oct 21 16:34:09 2015 From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:34:09 +0200 Subject: [connect-wg] PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan Message-ID: <20151021143409.GI24841@22.rev.meerval.net> Dear Connect Working Group, Many of you are probably familiar with "PeeringDB", one of the most awesome resources for interconnection. What some of you might not know, is that PeeringDB is evolving from a bunch of php scripts into a real organisation with a board and appropiate legal registrations! And as PeeringDB stakeholder you can actually have say in how things are run! :-) Please review Chris Caputo's message below and subscribe yourself to the "pdb-gov" mailing list to stay informed about PeeringDB's governance. Being subscribed to the pdb-gov mailing list (in essence) means you are a 'member' and this will grant your organisation one vote in the upcoming elections. Kind regards, Job ----- Forwarded message from Chris Caputo ----- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:49:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Chris Caputo To: pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com Subject: [PDB-gov] PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan Results of the survey which ended August 15th, along with anonymous comments are up at: https://www.caputo.com/pdb/20150800_PDB_Survey_results.pdf 91 responses, of which 89 voted for the main question: PeeringDB functions should be performed by: - 35 votes, 39.33%: "An independent 501(C)(6) (Not for profit) PeeringDB, with it's own elected board and members" - 14 votes, 15.73%: "The existing global standards body OpenIX 501(C)(6) (Not for profit)" - 10 votes, 11.24%: "The existing regional organization NANOG 501(C)(3) (Not for profit)" - 30 votes, 33.71%: "I don't care just as long as PeeringDB keeps working" That looks like a clear vote for independence, given that the number for independence is 45% more than the combined votes for OpenIX and NANOG. Based on this, we are going to continue working toward becoming an independent non-profit corporation. In the interest of broad support, this is going to be done with transparency and inclusion using the pdb-gov mailing list. The plan: - If you want to participate in the process, please subscribe to the pdb-gov "governance" mailing list with your PeeringDB account email. http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov - Further emails will be sent to pdb-gov mailing list and posted to http://gov.peeringdb.com/ as appropriate. - pdb-gov is where the draft organizational documents will be discussed and refined. These draft documents are up at: https://www.caputo.com/pdb/ - There will be elections for the initial Board of Directors. Candidacies along with max 300 word statements should be submitted to secretary at peeringdb.com prior to November 15th. Anyone can run for election to the initial Board. - The interim Secretary (tentatively Chris Caputo) will send out ballots to pdb-gov on November 15th, with voting to happen through November 30th. The org docs currently proscribe one ballot per member organization. The interim Secretary will break ties through public random means. The Secretary will not be eligible for election to the initial Board. - The initial Board will decide on officers, per the tentative Bylaws. The draft documents will then be signed and filed. _______________________________________________ Pdb-gov mailing list Pdb-gov at lists.peeringdb.com http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov ----- End forwarded message ----- From lavroff at google.com Mon Oct 26 08:37:55 2015 From: lavroff at google.com (Florence Lavroff) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:37:55 +0100 Subject: [connect-wg] Draft agenda for Connect-WG @ RIPE 71 Message-ID: Dear friends of Connect-WG, As RIPE 71 is coming closer, time has come to share with you our draft agenda for our session on Wednesday, November, 18th from 11:00 to 12.30 : 1. Welcome (1 min) Appoint scribe, present agenda 2. 4 Lightning talks (20 min) a. So, you've decided to peer? - Matthew Walster, Fastly b. Study about Internet interconnections : Preliminary results - Uta Meier-Hahn, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society c. BGP communities for blackholing traffic - Thomas King, DECIX d. Follow up : Working with CDNs : towards BCOP - Florence Lavroff 3. Update on MANRS - Andrei Robachevsky, ISOC (10 min) 4. Traffic Volume Dependencies of Large IXPs - Thomas King, DECIX (20min) 5. Countries, IXPs and RIPE Atlas - Emile Aben, RIPE NCC (20min) 6. Presentation [Title to be provided later] - Elisa Jasinska (20 min) 7. Closure (1min) I also inform you that I, Florence Lavroff, won?t be able to co-chair this Connect-WG session because I am now in a too advanced stage of my pregnancy to travel. Our dear colleague Filiz Yilmaz kindly accepted to jump in and take over my role as co-chair for this meeting. Thanks to her for her availability and support ! Best regards, Florence and Remco Connect-WG Co-chairs -- Florence Lavroff / lavroff at google.com / +31 20 504 5474 / +31 6 11 01 55 80 Peering and Content Distribution / Google EMEA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: