[coc-tf] Balance between between judgement and process (was: Re: (no subject))

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:54 AM Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote:
> On 16 Feb 2022, at 22:39, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
> > - When an incident takes place at an event, the Code of Conduct Team
> > CANNOT suggest excluding the subject of the report from participating
> > in the RIPE community after the conclusion of the event.[0]
> > - When an incident takes place over the Internet, the Code of Conduct
> > Team CANNOT suggest excluding the subject of the report from
> > participating in the RIPE community for more than one month.
>
> Leo, I’m sorry for the delay in following up on the discussion Mirjam
> and I had with you on Wednesday. We’ve had an extended holiday weekend
> here in Ireland.
>
> I think it’s appropriate not to constrain what the Code-of-Conduct Team
> may SUGGEST, but rather to limit the severity of sanctions which are to
> be applied without confirmation by a higher authority.
>
> I hope this helps, and isn’t too terse or abstract.

This is helpful.

At last week's meeting we made progress on the process document. The
approach now is that the CoC Team will inform the RIPE Chair and RIPE
NCC of a decision before it's implemented. We also agreed to publish a
blog post with some specific questions in it, so the community is
informed about the choices being made. I have drafted a blog post,
which is with the RIPE Labs team. It has a section on specific
questions:

" We would like your thoughts on the authority to delegate to the Code
of Conduct Team.

" How much responsibility should we delegate to the Code of Conduct
Team? Do you want a threshold beyond which their decisions become
advisory?

" The RIPE NCC will always ensure the record keeping system meets all
legal requirements. But do you want it to be able to track a pattern
of behaviour that generates multiple reports?"

I am hoping we'll be able to publish the draft and blog post at the
start of April.

Kind regards,

Leo