[bcop] Community statement
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benno Overeinder
benno at NLnetLabs.nl
Mon May 30 15:55:36 CEST 2016
Hi Sander, On 30/05/16 15:48, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing >> plenary session. > > Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is that they wanted a stronger statement :) Ruediger Volk was the person stating that on the microphone during the plenary, and he offered to help improve the language. I talked to Hans Petter Holen about what to do next, and he suggested taking this to the ripe-list so we can get consensus there and still turn this into a community-wide supported statement, which I think is important. > > I suggest Ruediger and I work on the text and then take it straight to the ripe-list. Doing word-smithing first in BCOP and then on the ripe-list will probably double the work, and as the BCOP task force already had consensus on the old version I'd like to take this directly to the superset :-) > > Do you agree with this plan? I was happy to hear that the plenary supported the idea, but asked for a stronger wording of the statement. The procedure you suggested makes sense to me. Best, - Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/bcop/attachments/20160530/b7280c61/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Community statement
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]