[bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Enno Rey
erey at ernw.de
Wed Oct 15 21:47:27 CEST 2014
Guys, thank you very much, Iljitsch, for starting this - as I think - long needed discussion. Given I have some background as for the reasoning and perspective of "those organizations wishing to deaggregate" I will happily join the discussion in London. Please allow to point interested parties to this blogpost on the topic: http://www.insinuator.net/2014/10/deaggregation-by-large-organizations/, and to the slides referenced therein which might serve as a contribution to the discussion beforehand. cheers Enno On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:42:43PM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 15/10/14 16:00, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > FYI, I just sent this to the IETF v6ops and grow lists: > > > > We are all familiar with PA (provider aggregatable) and PI (provider > > independent) address space. But it turns out a new type of IPv6 > > address space is starting to show up, which I'll call organization > > deaggregatable (OD) address space (until someone suggests a better > > name). > > Dear Iljitsch, > > My *personal* feeling is that RIRs (and NOGs) would be much more > suitable place for this discussion, as IETF in principle and > historically was not meant to deal with routing policy and/or routing > table handling. > > Being said that, if you can join us on Monday, 3rd November at 18:00 in > London for RIPE BCOP TF meeting, I think we can have appropriate > discussion about this topic and also ask operators in the room if they > would be interested to join and work cooperatively with you on this > document. > > Dear BCOP community - Benno and myself would really appreciate some > feedback on this topic before the meeting, so we can shape the message > and discussion properly. Goal of the BCOP TF is to get operators > together to document Best Current Operational Practice and I think this > could be very well one of most needed ones. > > Cheers and thnx, Jan Zorz > -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator =======================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]