[bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de
Thu May 22 11:31:45 CEST 2014
+1! Me, too! -- Sebastian Becker sb at lab.dtag.de Am 22.05.2014 um 11:22 schrieb Karsten Thomann <karsten_thomann at linfre.de>: > Hi, > > I would also like to participate as much as my time allows. > > Am 22.05.2014 08:13, schrieb Alex Saroyan: >> Hi, >> >> Maybe I missed something, was busy to participate this Ripe meeting. Just want to express my will in participating to BGP BCOP. >> >> Best Regards >> /Alex Saroyan >> >> Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks for the info Benno! With that also being a fledgling initiative, >>>> there is probably no harm in NANOG moving toward that same goal...Now, >>>> merging the documents and determining which best practice is in-fact BEST >>>> may become interesting, but that is a problem for the future. >>> Indeed! >>> >>> >From my perspective: After NANOG 61 we should have a good grasp on who >>> all from this region is willing and able to participate. At that time >>> I suggest that we merge the interested NANOGers with the interested >>> RIPE'rs and form one BGP BCOP cross-regional working group to build a >>> single document which we can both publish (or we can choose one place >>> to publish if that makes more sense)... >>> >>> I note that the RIPE "IPv6 Helpdesk" BCOP is being written using a >>> similar model, with folks from both regions working together to draft >>> a single document. >>> >>> $0.02 >>> ~Chris >>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> With the last RIPE68 meeting, a BGP configuration BCOP proposal was >>>>> presented by Francios Contat, see >>>>> https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/. >>>>> >>>>> In the slides, Francios explained their approach: get ISPs on board, >>>>> definitions, scenarios, good practices, etc. The presentation was a call for >>>>> interest for others to join. Next is to redefine goals, scope, etc., such >>>>> that it will become a manageable document. Work to obtain input, review, >>>>> collect comments will take place in the RIPE Routing Working Group. >>>>> >>>>> The document already available is in French, but Google translate does a >>>>> good job to obtain an English version. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Benno Overeinder >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op 21 mei 2014 om 17:35 heeft Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> het >>>>> volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> Ahoy There! >>>>> Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through the >>>>> NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified a >>>>> stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are using as >>>>> seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of >>>>> questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to turn up >>>>> and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is already a >>>>> "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the >>>>> works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on >>>>> display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our goal is >>>>> to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this >>>>> problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the "eBGP >>>>> Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your >>>>> expertise across the internet! >>>>> >>>>> THANKS! >>>>> Bill Armstrong >>>>> >>>>> P.S. >>>>> I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have >>>>> questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a chat! >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> BCOP mailing list >>>>> BCOP at mailman.nanog.org >>>>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BCOP mailing list >>>> BCOP at mailman.nanog.org >>>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> @ChrisGrundemann >>> http://chrisgrundemann.com >>> > > ############################################## # Mail Account for technical purposes only ##############################################
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]