[bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Grundemann
cgrundemann at gmail.com
Thu May 22 00:19:42 CEST 2014
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info Benno! With that also being a fledgling initiative, > there is probably no harm in NANOG moving toward that same goal...Now, > merging the documents and determining which best practice is in-fact BEST > may become interesting, but that is a problem for the future. Indeed! >From my perspective: After NANOG 61 we should have a good grasp on who all from this region is willing and able to participate. At that time I suggest that we merge the interested NANOGers with the interested RIPE'rs and form one BGP BCOP cross-regional working group to build a single document which we can both publish (or we can choose one place to publish if that makes more sense)... I note that the RIPE "IPv6 Helpdesk" BCOP is being written using a similar model, with folks from both regions working together to draft a single document. $0.02 ~Chris > > Bill > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> With the last RIPE68 meeting, a BGP configuration BCOP proposal was >> presented by Francios Contat, see >> https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/. >> >> In the slides, Francios explained their approach: get ISPs on board, >> definitions, scenarios, good practices, etc. The presentation was a call for >> interest for others to join. Next is to redefine goals, scope, etc., such >> that it will become a manageable document. Work to obtain input, review, >> collect comments will take place in the RIPE Routing Working Group. >> >> The document already available is in French, but Google translate does a >> good job to obtain an English version. >> >> Best, >> >> Benno Overeinder >> >> >> Op 21 mei 2014 om 17:35 heeft Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> Ahoy There! >> Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through the >> NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified a >> stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are using as >> seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of >> questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to turn up >> and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is already a >> "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the >> works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on >> display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our goal is >> to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this >> problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the "eBGP >> Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your >> expertise across the internet! >> >> THANKS! >> Bill Armstrong >> >> P.S. >> I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have >> questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a chat! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> BCOP mailing list >> BCOP at mailman.nanog.org >> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop > > > > _______________________________________________ > BCOP mailing list > BCOP at mailman.nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop > -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]