Re: support for ASO initiative - Concert

• To: Concert IP Admin < >
• From: John C Klensin < >
• Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 11:50:56 -0400
• Originator-info: login-id=klensin; server=shoe.reston.mci.net

Edwin,

Because it may be important for the rest of us to understand,
could you explain _what_ is "against offiicial company policy"?
Specifically:

Is the policy that 

     * you don't have permission/authority to issue this type of
     endorsement, but Concert and/or its parents have not 
     taken a position on the RIPE-NCC/APNIC/ARIN ASO proposal ?
or

     * Concert (or its parents) have taken, or plans to take, a 
     position opposing that proposal and favoring another one ?
or

     * Concert (or its parents) have decided to oppose ICANN
     entirely and, hence, the ASO question is moot?

thanks,
    john

----------------------

--On Monday, 26 July, 1999, 15:02 +0200 Concert IP Admin
ipadmin@localhost wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Sorry but herewith I withdraw my support for the ASO
> initiative, done originally in the mail below.
> The reason being that it is against official company policy.
> 
> I do apoligize for this, it shouldn't have happened.
> 
> Edwin Asmus
> European Operations - Concert IP Address Manager
> Tel +31 20 487 6140
> e-mail: ciam@localhost
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Concert IP Admin ipadmin@localhost
> aso-discuss@localhost
> Cc: Hans Koolen hkoolen@localhost
> Date: maandag 19 juli 1999 14:24
> Subject: support for ASO initiative - Concert
> 
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >We would like to support this good initiative:
> >
> >Company: Concert Communications Company
> >
> >RIPE
> >
> >concert.nl
> >concert.uk
> >concert.sp
> >concert.it
> >concert.eu
> >
> >APNIC
> >
> >concert-ap
> >
> >Best regards,
> >>
> >Edwin Asmus
> >European Operations - Concert IP Address Manager
> >Tel +31 20 487 6140
> >e-mail: ciam@localhost
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: support for ASO initiative - Concert
    • From: Concert IP Admin