<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hello, <div class="moz-forward-container"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> I just read through the whole mailing list archive to get a picture of this proposal and firstly please let me say I'm impressed about all the (team)work that you did to get this proposal running :) I used the word-document that Elvis send me earlier with the latest version of the policy text and on the first page I added details that I found in the mailing list archive (details to the authors, rationale). Please let me know if everything is as you wish. If I overlooked something or misunderstood something then please don't get mad on me - as you might know I'm quite new on this job :) Some comments: 1) I adjusted the organisation details for the authors but did not include the the job position yet as I'm not aware that this was included in previous proposals. 2) Do you plan some future work on the arguments supporting/ <meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> opposing <title></title> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice 4.0.0 (Unix)"> <style type="text/css">  </style> the proposal? As this policy proposal is big it might be good to anticipate as much arguments as possible. 3) Do you wish any support from our Comms department regarding better English or editing the summary, the rationale and/or the policy text? This is just something optional, I think especially the policy text looks very good. Best regards, Marco Schmidt PDO office On 8/28/13 10:07 AM, Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:7C49C19C69319E4FB1279CA15A84D18B61DC0DB6@SAX20244.bia.abraxas.ch" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hi everyone, My signature should be: Sonderegger Olaf, Abraxas Informatik AG, ICT Architect, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:olaf.sonderegger@abraxas.ch">olaf.sonderegger@abraxas.ch</a> About arguments: Should we prepare a list of pro and cons, so that we could add some arguments/ideas/solutions per list item? As Gert mentioned, it's better to provide some ideas/solutions for cons. Kind regards, Olaf -----Original Message----- From: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces@ripe.net">apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces@ripe.net</a> [<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces@ripe.net">mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces@ripe.net</a>] On Behalf Of Elvis Velea Sent: Dienstag, 27. August 2013 20:03 To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi@ripe.net">apwg-ipv6-papi@ripe.net</a>; <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pdo@ripe.net">pdo@ripe.net</a> Subject: Re: [Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done? Hi everyone, I'm very happy everyone responded today ;) that's a first :P To answer everyone in a row: 1. @Sander - I also explained the idea to Andrew and he was interested in listening to all the pro's and con's. I think it will have quite some impact on the RIPE NCC so I wanted the board to have a look at it as well. 2. @Gert - I am sure it will have some good response, we will see over time. 3. @Andrea & Marco - please let me know if it's clear what I did in that document. I can provide access to the shared google document if you can not copy the data from the attachments I've provided in my previous email. Marco, when you have a second, do let us know when you think the proposal could be advanced to the mailing list. Please note that the three proposers are: me - Elvis Daniel Velea, V4Escrow LLC, Chief Business Analyst, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:elvis@v4escrow.net">elvis@v4escrow.net</a> Daniel Stolpe, Resilans AB, position?, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:stolpe@resilans.se">stolpe@resilans.se</a> Sonderegger Olaf, ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG, position?, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Olaf.Sonderegger@abraxas.ch">Olaf.Sonderegger@abraxas.ch</a> 4. @Daniel - Ingrid is still part of the Registration Services as far as I know, and as far as I understand, she, Andrea and Marco will take over the PDO function that Emilio had. So we will have 3 people helping us instead of just one. That must be good news, right? :-) Regarding the presentations during the RIPE Meeting, what I want us to do is: - present the current 'problems' of the IPv6 policy during the Plenary - possibly present the idea to the IPv6-WG, but keep the discussion in the AP-WG - discuss the proposal during the AP-WG - possibly present at the GM an idea on how this may influence the whole community and the impact it may have to the charging scheme and the RIPE NCC @Everyone: we still need to figure out what we will be writing on the Rationale, arguments pro and con. cheers, elvis (happy on the feedback received today) _______________________________________________ Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing list <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Apwg-ipv6-papi@ripe.net">Apwg-ipv6-papi@ripe.net</a> <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi">https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi</a> </pre> </blockquote> </div> </body> </html>