[Apwg-ipv6-papi] Meeting planning

[Gert Doering]

Hi folks,

the discussion has started, and it's quite positive so far :-) - working
on details, working on definitions, but no fundamental opposition.

Anyway: looking ahead.  There's a RIPE meeting coming up, and I've set
aside most of the second time slot (70-ish minutes) for this proposal.

To make the best use of this time, the discussion should be well-prepared
and well-coordinated.  For that, I'd ask you (the volunteer crew) to
listen closely to the various arguments brought up on the list, and try
to extract individual discussion items on this, so the whole thing can
be broken down to smaller and more well-manageable pieces.

Like, for example

 - how should the "sub-lir" "sponsored-lir" "child-lir" be called?

 - should we work on the wording for "users who want a /48"?  (Right now
   the community seems to read an endorsement to go to a /32 in there,
   while I think the policy document should be neutral on the size of
   an allocation)

 - ...

more items will come up :-)

thanks,

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/apwg-ipv6-papi/attachments/20130927/8fbda0ff/attachment.bin