[Apwg-ipv6-papi] [pdo] discuss the policy proposal during the plenary? + informal meeting

[Ingrid Wijte]

Good morning,

I have emailed to reserve a room for Monday 17:30. I'll let you know 
which room it will be.

Cheers,
Ingrid

On 9/19/13 5:02 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/19/13 4:22 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:29:02PM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
>>> I have received an answer from the meeting program committee and my
>>> request for a presentation during the plenary has been rejected..
>>> probably because I have not had enough time to create any slides for
>>> this presentation and my application was lacking details :(
>>
>> Yeah, the PC told us that they didn't see what this was all about, so
>> deferred to the APWG ("this is policy stuff, not plenary") - which did
>> not go so well.
>>
>
> yeah, I wasn't so clear about what the presentation will contain and 
> what this was all about. I do understand their point of view..
>
>> You could try for a lightning talk, to raise awareness.
>
> We'll see if there is time for a lightning talk, maybe I'll just setup 
> a few slides and bring them along, if any spot comes up. Although, 
> since this proposal will be sent to the APWG mailing list and a 
> heads-up will be sent to IPv6 WG, I think it will make sense to just 
> invite everyone to participate in the discussion during the APWG.
>
>>
>> IPv6 is meeting *after* APWG, so that's not a useful WG to do an "please
>> come to APWG to discuss this" intro - and also their agenda seems to be
>> quite full from what I saw.  So maybe just send a "HEADS UP, something
>> big is coming!" mail to ipv6-wg near the RIPE meeting, give a short
>> summary what it's about and tell people that if they are interested, 
>> they
>> should go to APWG.
>>
>
> yup, the heads up will be sent to the IPv6-WG mailing list once the 
> policy proposal is made public.
>
>> (Where we'll have *plenty* of time, as far as I can currently estimate)
>
> good :-)
>
> I'll prepare a few slides to present during the WG. First few slides 
> will be focused on how the current policy works, then I think that we 
> should present what doesn't work, then what we want to change and 
> lastly the final solution.. I expect to have about 10-15 slides.
>
>>
>>
>>> Regarding our informal meeting, should we meet on Monday evening or on
>>> Tuesday during lunch? As the RIPE Meeting is getting close, I would 
>>> like
>>> to reserve a slot in my calendar and discuss this proposal before it's
>>> presented in the WGs.
>>> I see that on Monday there are two social events, 18:30 ? 19:00 (Meet
>>> the RIPE NCC Executive Board) and 19:00 ? 21:00 (RIPE 67 Welcome 
>>> Drinks)
>>> We could meet in the slot between 17:30 and 18:30 if you are not
>>> attending the BoF (Best Current Operational Practices (BCOP) BoF)
>>
>> I can make either.  I'm not under particular pressure to meet the 
>> executive
>> board ("I've met them before" :-) ), so we can find a spot where Marco
>> and Sander have time.  It make sense to have Marco/Ingrid/PDO there,
>> especially as they can find a room for us :-)
>
> Okay, well.. I'd say that Monday, just after the Plenary would be 
> great. One hour, starting 17:30, should be more than enough time to 
> discuss and plan the strategy ;)
>
> @Ingrid/Marco/Andrea - can we ask you to find a room for us or should 
> I mail meeting@ ?
>
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>          -- NetMaster
>>
>
> cheers,
> elvis
>