[Apwg-ipv6-papi] discuss the policy proposal during the plenary? + informal meeting

[Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG]

Hi Elvis

First: Unfortunately, I am not able to attend the RIPE meeting.

Second: I think, it's an important change. So, it would be nice to introduce proposal at both WG. In my point of view, this important change should be spread as wide as possible that it could be discussed within whole RIPE community. But, discussion will be held within WG mailing lists. Any RIPE member has the possibility to join WG mailing list, if he want to join discussion.

The question is: Would any RIPE member join additionally WG mailing list, if he has been advised of proposal during RIPE meeting?

I don't know the answer, because I don't have any experience in that.

Cheers, Olaf


-----Original Message-----
From: apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Elvis Velea
Sent: Dienstag, 17. September 2013 23:29
To: apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
Cc: pdo at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [Apwg-ipv6-papi] discuss the policy proposal during the plenary? + informal meeting

Hi everyone,

I have received an answer from the meeting program committee and my request for a presentation during the plenary has been rejected.. 
probably because I have not had enough time to create any slides for this presentation and my application was lacking details :(

their answer was:
"The PC felt that your submission was lacking in detail and we could not see how it fitted into the Plenary. I've spoken to the Address Policy WG Chairs and I realise you are raising some of these matters in the WG. 
For future reference it should be noted that submissions to the PC are separate to those to any Working Group and as much information as possible is required in order for proper evaluation to take place."

Should we just have a slot for it during both AP-WG and IPv6-WG or should I try to talk to the PC and explain why a presentation in the Plenary would be beneficial?


Regarding our informal meeting, should we meet on Monday evening or on Tuesday during lunch? As the RIPE Meeting is getting close, I would like to reserve a slot in my calendar and discuss this proposal before it's presented in the WGs.
I see that on Monday there are two social events, 18:30 - 19:00 (Meet the RIPE NCC Executive Board) and 19:00 - 21:00 (RIPE 67 Welcome Drinks) We could meet in the slot between 17:30 and 18:30 if you are not attending the BoF (Best Current Operational Practices (BCOP) BoF)

Regarding the informal meeting, I think at least me, Daniel, Sander and Gert should meet (Olaf is not coming to the meeting as far as I understand). I am not sure if Andrea, Marco or Ingrid want to participate, they would be welcome if they do :-)

cheers,
elvis


On 8/27/13 4:10 PM, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> And about presentations, just to be clear, some IPv6 talk in the 
>> plenary Tuesday, and then a presentation of the new proposal 
>> Wednesday morning (address policy WG)? I am not quite following why 
>> the presentation should be in the plenary rather than in the WG(s).
>
> Because the impact of this proposal is so big that it should be brought to everyones attention. Discussing it can then take place in the WG.
>
> Cheers,
> Sander
>

_______________________________________________
Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing list
Apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi