[Apwg-ipv6-papi] informal meeting + slides

[Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG]

Hi,

First: Thank you for your work, Elvis. It's look great.

About feedback point 4:

"4. Remove the PI and Sponsoring LIR concepts
- everything must flow via the LIR
- if the LIR is closed, you must renumber your network
- if you have a problem with the LIR, you must renumber"

Additional argument:
We have a lot of customers, they aren't able to understand any kind of RIPE NCC policies. And, they don't want to read these policies. They want to utilize a service, which provide them address space with policy conformity. Switzerland is highly service-oriented, enterprises concentrate on their business. In addition, Europe has more and more a problem with skills shortage (e.g. Switzerland, Germany). So, concept "Sponsoring LIR" is essential.


I wish you good look at presentation.

Cheers, Olaf


-----Original Message-----
From: apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Elvis Velea
Sent: Freitag, 11. Oktober 2013 23:05
To: Gert Doering
Cc: apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [Apwg-ipv6-papi] informal meeting + slides

Hi,

what do you guys think about the slides?

Cheers,
elvis

On 10/9/13 5:35 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 05:29:08PM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
>>>> can you give me your previous slides? editable? :-)
>>> If you can handle LaTeX...?
>>
>> ouch, I was able to handle it when I was at university.. all that 
>> knowledge is now gone :))
>
> Thought so, the NCC is way too microsoft-centric :-)
>
>> I'll look for the pdf version :)
>
> https://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/148-wg.pdf
>
> starting at page 19
>
> RIPE 63 then revisited that topic, based on the outline document we 
> sent to the mailing list (attached).
>
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster
>