[Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done?

[Elvis Daniel Velea]

Hi Daniel, Sander,

my intention is to also talk at the GM and explain a bit our intention
of this policy and additionally propose on the membership mailing list
to make some calculation on how could the price of membership could be
decreased if the price of the maintenance of the portable would be a
bit increased. Basically, my intention is, in a few years to have
almost the same price for membership as the price for the maintenance
of portable allocation.

cheers,
elvis

Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.

On 29 aug. 2013, at 22:32, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> RIPE membership. If one single LIR can ask for 10 x /32 for 10 entities
>> that are now not forced into RIPE membership by address space need, they
>> may chose not to become members. RIPE will have to come up with solutions.
>> Either direct fees for these 10 entities or possibly an increased fee for
>> the one LIR.
>
> s/RIPE/The RIPE NCC AGM/
>
>> And also, make membership more attractive in itself. You can be a RIPE
>> member without beeing a RIPE LIR, right? Why should you?
>
> Cheers,
> Sander
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing list
> Apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi