[Apwg-ipv6-papi] [pdo] policy proposal done?

[Elvis Daniel Velea]

Hi Marco, just noticed a typo:

'Where this extension not possible, the organisations has', please fix this
with 'the organisation has'

regarding COMMS' offer to help, I'd really appreciate if they could have a
look at the document and tell us what they would change regarding better
English.

However, this is a long document so if they expect it to take longer than a
week , let's just push it now, as it is, and we'll probably be revising it
before it gets approved... we may use their help with the revision :-)

I think we need at least a few weeks of discussion before the RIPE Meeting.

cheers,
elvis

Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.

On 29 aug. 2013, at 20:53, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:

 Hello,

I just read through the whole mailing list archive to get a picture of this
proposal and firstly please let me say I'm impressed about all the
(team)work that you did to get this proposal running :)

I used the word-document that Elvis send me earlier with the latest version
of the policy text and on the first page I added details that I found in
the mailing list archive (details to the authors, rationale).

Please let me know if everything is as you wish.

If I overlooked something or misunderstood something then please don't get
mad on me - as you might know I'm quite new on this job :)


Some comments:

1)
I adjusted the organisation details for the authors but did not include the
the job position yet as I'm not aware that this was included in previous
proposals.

2)
Do you plan some future work on the arguments supporting/ opposing  the
proposal? As this policy proposal is big it might be good to anticipate as
much arguments as possible.


3)
Do you wish any support from our Comms department regarding better English
or editing the summary, the rationale and/or the policy text? This is just
something optional, I think especially the policy text looks very good.



Best regards,
Marco Schmidt
PDO office


On 8/28/13 10:07 AM, Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG wrote:

Hi everyone,

My signature should be: Sonderegger Olaf, Abraxas Informatik AG, ICT
Architect, olaf.sonderegger at abraxas.ch

About arguments:
Should we prepare a list of pro and cons, so that we could add some
arguments/ideas/solutions per list item?

As Gert mentioned, it's better to provide some ideas/solutions for cons.

Kind regards, Olaf


-----Original Message-----
From: apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net
[mailto:apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net
<apwg-ipv6-papi-bounces at ripe.net>] On Behalf Of Elvis Velea
Sent: Dienstag, 27. August 2013 20:03
To: apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net; pdo at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done?

Hi everyone,

I'm very happy everyone responded today ;) that's a first :P

To answer everyone in a row:

1. @Sander - I also explained the idea to Andrew and he was interested
in listening to all the pro's and con's. I think it will have quite
some impact on the RIPE NCC so I wanted the board to have a look at it
as well.

2. @Gert - I am sure it will have some good response, we will see over time.

3. @Andrea & Marco - please let me know if it's clear what I did in
that document. I can provide access to the shared google document if
you can not copy the data from the attachments I've provided in my
previous email.
Marco, when you have a second, do let us know when you think the
proposal could be advanced to the mailing list.

Please note that the three proposers are:
me - Elvis Daniel Velea, V4Escrow LLC, Chief Business Analyst,
elvis at v4escrow.net

Daniel Stolpe, Resilans AB, position?, stolpe at resilans.se

Sonderegger Olaf, ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG, position?, Olaf.Sonderegger at abraxas.ch

4. @Daniel - Ingrid is still part of the Registration Services as far
as I know, and as far as I understand, she, Andrea and Marco will take
over the PDO function that Emilio had. So we will have 3 people
helping us instead of just one. That must be good news, right? :-)

Regarding the presentations during the RIPE Meeting, what I want us to do is:
- present the current 'problems' of the IPv6 policy during the Plenary
- possibly present the idea to the IPv6-WG, but keep the discussion in the AP-WG
- discuss the proposal during the AP-WG
- possibly present at the GM an idea on how this may influence the
whole community and the impact it may have to the charging scheme and
the RIPE NCC

@Everyone: we still need to figure out what we will be writing on the
Rationale, arguments pro and con.

cheers,
elvis
(happy on the feedback received today)

_______________________________________________
Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing
listApwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.nethttps://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi




<IPv6policyproposal.doc>

_______________________________________________
Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing list
Apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/apwg-ipv6-papi/attachments/20130829/3a3b0941/attachment.html