[Apwg-ipv6-papi] policy proposal done?

[Elvis Velea]

Dear Emilio, all,

I would like to move this forward, I have been talking to some (RIPE 
NCC, board, community) people attending the APNIC36 meeting and I am now 
sure that this is the right time to move this proposal forward.

Therefore, if nothing exceptionally changes by the end of the week, once 
I'm back in the Netherlands next week (from hot China) I will contact 
Emilio and ask him to formally give the policy proposal a name and number.

I am sorry to be stealing this from all of you and I do understand that 
some of you have better things to do, however, I have invested a lot of 
time in writing and editing this proposal and I feel that I have to give 
it a try.

I've also asked a few of the board members to have a look at the 
document, you may see that I have shared the document with them so that 
they can (only) view it. That is because I had some concerns on what 
would a charging scheme look like in a world where everyone could 
receive a (minimum) /32.

@Olaf and Daniel - if you think you have the time to read the document 
and come back with comments by Monday, and if you think you have enough 
time to discuss it on the mailing list once this is sent there, please 
let me know and the three of us can continue to be the proposers and 
work on it.. do note that working will involve quite a few hours spent 
debating it on the mailing lists and at the RIPE Meeting before this 
will (if ever) become a policy.

Otherwise, just let me know and I'll ask Emilio to move the proposal 
forward on my behalf.

cheers,
elvis

On 8/25/13 4:36 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On 8/24/13 4:50 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> I've read up on the discussions, and I think Sander has answered most of
>> your questions already.
>>
>
> yes, all of the questions have been answered.
>
>> I have still not closely read the document, shame on me :-( but promise
>> to do so "soon".
>
> well, from my side it's now done. I hope you all find the time to read
> it soon ;)
>
>> As for publishing as a policy proposal, we should
>> definitely do that some weeks before the RIPE meeting to get people
>> primed, and then have a good discussion in Athens (while "everything
>> happens on the list", the exchange of thoughts and issues is just faster
>> when everybody is in the room).
>
> I agree, that is why I have been working around the clock to have it
> done. My opinion is that we can now officially give it a number and send
> it to the list. I'm just waiting for the 6 of us to agree :)
>
>>
>> Still a bit worried about clash of attention span with 2013-03 (no
>> need) -
>> that should have been long done, but we're doing another round, and I
>> have
>> no idea how long the IA will take.
>
> I followed the discussion and have seen all the discrepancies. My
> opinion is that it's quite easy to find a way around it, but that's an
> other discussion we should have either there or in private. I'll keep my
> comments for there or for at the RIPE Meeting.
>
> Regarding the work done on the PAPI proposal, I have the feeling that we
> are done and I do expect to maybe have to revise this version once
> everyone on the list has had the time to read it and give us their
> comments.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> cheers,
> elvis
>
> PS: I've re-designed the diagram, let me know if it makes sense or if we
> should modify it again.
>
> PPS: thanks Emilio :-)