[Apwg-ipv6-papi] The Picture / Re: first draft?

[Sander Steffann]

Hi,

I think things are going in the right direction. I don't have time now to read through all the text now, but I'll try to find that time next week.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Sander Steffann

Op 21 aug. 2013 om 20:40 heeft Daniel Stolpe <stolpe at resilans.se> het volgende geschreven:

> 
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Elvis Velea wrote:
> 
>> any rationale against it?
>> 
>> what about:
>> 
>> - if this is accepted, the organisations that can receive a /32 (or
>> larger) allocations via a Sponsoring LIR will no longer see an incentive
>> to become an LIR
> 
> This one will come up so we had better think about it. My personal view - or should I say "position" - is that we (as in RIPE) should not force organisations to become LIR:s. We (as in my company) have a lot of customers that are by now means ISP:s, but they need something bigger than a /48. They should not have to become an LIR if they find a sponsor.
> 
> I guess RIPE will have to show more membership benefits than "you will be able to get IP addresses".
> 
>>>> 5. Is it ok to request LIRs that make sub-allocations bigger than /32 to
>>>> send a request to the RIPE NCC for approval?
>>> 
>>> That is ok, but explain the reasons.
>> 
>> Well, if an LIR makes a sub-allocation larger than a /32, then I think
>> the RIPE NCC should be the one approving the request. If an organisation
>> needs an allocation larger than a /32 (64K /48s), then I think that an
>> evaluation should be made.
> 
> I see your point. So, do we want to limit the freedom of the LIR:s or not?
> 
>>>> 9. Is it ok to have a minimum allocation of a /32? For both LIRs and the
>>>> customers that previously used to receive a PI assignment?
>>> 
>>> No, if someone only needs a /48 they should be able to get it.
>> 
>> ok, can you have a look at 5.1.2 in the policy proposal text and see if
>> it makes sense?
>> 
>> Minimum allocation is a /32 and the NCC can make /48s upon request.
> 
> I think it looks OK. What do you say Sander?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________
> Daniel Stolpe           Tel:  08 - 688 11 81                   stolpe at resilans.se
> Resilans AB             Fax:  08 - 55 00 21 63            http://www.resilans.se/
> Box 13 054                                  556741-1193
> 103 02 Stockholm
>