Re: [anti-spam-wg] abuse address field ?
From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@localhost
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:49 +0100
Cc: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@localhost
On 14 Apr 2008, at 10:52, Brian Boyle wrote:
I think consensus was reached, and a new object (irt) type was added
to the database. Shortly after, the database query response software
was modified to return irt objects in inetnum queries if they exist.
Not quite. A new attribute was added to a number of object
types, including irt (which already existed).
A quick summary is available on:
Which is where I found the information in my comment above.
It's up to whomever is responsible for a given database
object to advertise an abuse-mailbox for that object or for
a less-specific related object. "Think globally, act locally".
For example, checking just now to avoid embarrassment showed
that role UNA2-RIPE seems to have this attribute since 20050505.
Doing what you can to convince others to do likewise is not
forbidden. It's never too late. 8-)
University College Dublin IT Services
PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
Description: This is a digitally signed message part