Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois

• To: Kurt Jaeger < >
• From: Florian Weimer < >
• Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:46:42 +0200

* Kurt Jaeger:

> Additional comments from those against using the DNS RR RP ?

Not really an argument against RP, but merely an observation: if you
delegate the reverse zone, you automatically delegate authority for
the RP RR, too.  This can be dealt with proper policies, I believe,
and to some extent, it is even an advantage over IRT objects (a fair
number of mnt-irt: references have been introduced in legacy address
space without prior consent from the inetnum: object owners).

• Post To The List:
  • Post a response to this mail
  • Post a new topic

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: MarcoH

• References:
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Rodney Tillotson
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: MarcoH
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois
    • From: Kurt Jaeger