Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] SpamAssassin and this list
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:42:03 +0100
I think I might be able to make this a little clearer..
At 19:35 25/11/2003 +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
Anything that passes through the filter will still be checked manually and
won't be automatically forwarded to the mailing list, the filter would
simply help us to get rid of the obvious spam which we are not doing at the
Which will not work. Did you look at what spammers do currently?
They misspell words on purpose to get the eMails through the filters.
Filter producers are reworking their filters to catch up with these
and they already have done to some extent. Do you think a few
handmade modifications will bypass the filter? If it were as easy as
this the filters would be completely worthless.
So, currently we (at the RIPE NCC) manually go through every e-mail sent to
anti-spam-wg@localhost which is not from an address subscribed to the list.
If you are subscribed to the list your mail is automatically forwarded.
Hmmm ... I am on this list for a few months at least and I have never
seen UBE on that list. This may also be due to the fact that the list
ist subscriber-post only (at least it was the last time I checked).
So UBE transmissions will be droppped anyway.
Or are you talking about Bounces due to rejects?
Are they causing any serious problems to the admins of the mail servers?
And if so which one?
What is the reason for all of this?
With the other RIPE mailing lists we use a spam filter to block all the
obvious spam and then manually deal with the mails that slip through. We
haven't done this yet for anti-spam for the reasons pointed out by Rodney
(it might be more of a risk that a legitimate mail from a non-subscribed
address is discarded).
As one of the mail moderators at the RIPE NCC I have never heard of a
legitimate mail being discarded by the filters and we also find that it is
not very frequent that mails are sent from un-subscribed lists, so the
majority of mails dealt with manually are still spam. The filter however
does make quite a difference!
Obviously though as one of the moderators I am slightly biased and wouldn't
want to sway your opinions ;-)
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"